Nice. Saves me time and money since my graph would be virtually identical.
What's with the dip in the graph at 142.5km/h?

You mean ACIS? I don't know much about dynos but after 5k rpm the car feels faster and acts like mini VTEC so shouldn't it bump up the curve? Could be a resonator thing as well...

Haha nah I was just being a technical smart arse, we all know both systems have the same principles.

I'll have a look at it sometime. I was just curious how you missed the part that I was getting a rebuild :S if you read as far as to see I was getting bubbles. 
 
the cause was a blown head gasket.

^ Haha I remember that one, everyone was huddling around your car to help out and have a chat.

i'm doubtful it'll make more power than a beams if the ports, valves and cam lift are smaller?
 
i know port size isn't everything and sometimes smaller is better, but the stock beams valves are bigger than norm 3s, combined with the improved head design (port shape and angle, valve angle, comb chamber/squish areas etc) i'd say the beams would still have the edge.
 
tho it depends a bit on what rpm you can pull/make power too. the only thing you have is longer duration cams, but beams has vvti.
 
if you make power over 7000rpm then maybe you'll get close/more peak power, but to time the cam's like that you'd sacrifice a lot of bottom end, and the beams would have a lot more meatier midrange.
 
but yes, guess the only way we'll find out is when this is finished, can't wait. will be a screamer

according to my info (hyperrev mag, which lists all the specs and outputs for all gen1-3+vvti 3sg(t)es) the beams has 1mm bigger inlet valves, 256/10.5in 244/9.2ex cams.
 
all gen3+ have staggered cam's, longer duration/higher lift on intake. which must be due to the 3s exh ports flowing well enough, ie: no gain from having long dur exh cams in overall power figures = better driveability with not having too much overlap.
 
the beam having larger valves is like having a larger cam, also with the VVTi allows the overlap like long duration cams in the top rpm. 
 
along with the 65mm TB compared to gen2 55 TB and the more advanced head design and intake manifold i'm wouldn't count on getting more HP than a beams.
 
one issue i see is the long gen2 inlet runners, this isn't ideal for top rpm where your cams are aimed at.
 
TBH i hope you do make more power than a beams, then i can continue building my gen2 NA head for my 3sgte and not source a beams engine