Go back to home

V6 camry, worth getting?

Page: < 1234 > Showing page 3 of 4 - Powered by APG vNext Trial
Author
Knightrous
MR2 Deity
  • Total Posts : 2045
  • Scores: 272
  • Reward points: 5721
  • Joined: 4/7/2011
  • Location: .
  • Status: offline
RE: V6 camry, worth getting? Thursday, September 30, 2010 0:07 PM (permalink)
0
Thought I'd add a snippet from my build thread
quote:

I looked at a bunch of options before deciding on the V6 conversion.
4AGZE - About the same cost of the 1MZ for less HP and less torque.
4AGTE - Laggy, more engine bay heat, needs good intercooling. Too much hassle
3SGTE - Too heavy, too laggy in stock form, fairly expensive. I also don't like the idea of turbo AW11's, something about a glowing red object generating crazy heat in the engine bay puts me off.
SR16VE - Too much custom work, transaxles, shafts etc etc. Bit of a pipe dream idea.

The 1MZ was a good option for me, it is only marginally heavier then a 4AGZE, provides plenty of torque and hp with brilliant reliability.



In the assessment of my AW11, the car lacks torque mainly (It's a 4A, can't expect much before 4500rpm). I can drive the ass off it and keep up (and sometimes leave behind) the turbo cars on a good twisty road, but it would be a lot easier to do with more torque and some extra HP. The 1MZ is the easiest way IMHO to get more torque, double the horsepower and provide it all in a reliable, easy to use package.
#31
DVST8R
MR2 Aficionado
  • Total Posts : 535
  • Scores: 2
  • Reward points: 2498
  • Joined: 4/7/2011
  • Location: Australia
  • Status: offline
RE: V6 camry, worth getting? Thursday, September 30, 2010 0:21 PM (permalink)
0
quote:
Originally posted by Knightrous
- I don't know how you interpreted smoother power delivery as talking about how smooth the car rides on the road...



Was referring to cogs comments about silky smoothness and the noise it makes there, which is why that part was separated from the parts referring to your comments.
#32
Knightrous
MR2 Deity
  • Total Posts : 2045
  • Scores: 272
  • Reward points: 5721
  • Joined: 4/7/2011
  • Location: .
  • Status: offline
RE: V6 camry, worth getting? Thursday, September 30, 2010 5:37 AM (permalink)
0
quote:
Originally posted by DVST8R
Was referring to cogs comments about silky smoothness and the noise it makes there, which is why that part was separated from the parts referring to your comments.



Ah, my mistake then. Carry on chap
#33

DVST8R
MR2 Aficionado
  • Total Posts : 535
  • Scores: 2
  • Reward points: 2498
  • Joined: 4/7/2011
  • Location: Australia
  • Status: offline
RE: V6 camry, worth getting? Thursday, September 30, 2010 5:46 AM (permalink)
0
I can see how it would be a bigger improvement over a 4A compared to a 3S though.
#34
Bionikal
MR2 Scholar
  • Total Posts : 1003
  • Scores: -171
  • Reward points: 2607
  • Joined: 4/7/2011
  • Status: offline
RE: V6 camry, worth getting? Thursday, September 30, 2010 6:29 AM (permalink)
0
quote:
Originally posted by Knightrous
- Wow, lag and peakiness is more fun? Sh*7, quick everyone, go buy T70's turbro's for your cars, it will make it fully hektic fun.
- I'm looking at the lower weight advantage in respect to braking, cornering and weight distribution. It might not be a big deal to the fat SW20, but to my AW11, I'm not interested in having another 100kg down the back.
- Complexity in the sense you have a lot more areas for stuff to go wrong. Working on turbos and fixing them are in the majority, more expensive then a natro.



Yeah, no

The peakiness and lag maks it exciting, getting that kick in the pants from an accelleration rush is fun. Weather or not its practical is another matter. The stock Turbo is in no way laggy, hell a 2860 on an MR2 would make poo pooloads better power than your V6 and still have zip lag.. if your experiencing lag with a 3sgte on a decently selected turbo, you're in the wrong gear.

weight, if its really 100kg's then it may be a valid point. Even then, doing the usual bolt on's will save you some weight CAT/DP and changing the Alt bracket should get you around 30kg's

More to go wrong, no, not really. The added 'complexity' of a turbine is most definately worthwhile. Not sure how many people here have had to fix things specifically related to the turbo itself.

Most of your points are just fallacies.
#35
MRTurbo
SA Moderator
  • Total Posts : 2894
  • Scores: 81
  • Reward points: 4791
  • Joined: 4/7/2011
  • Location: Adelaide SA Australia
  • Status: offline
RE: V6 camry, worth getting? Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:00 AM (permalink)
0
I agree with Bionikal here. The "peakiness" and "lag" is definitely what makes it fun and to an extent, unpredictable. What lag? my car has a standard exhaust and even then the lag is pretty much unnoticeable - imagine if it had a full exhaust...(soon!)

As long as the turbine is properly lubricated and cooled down and not boosted to the moon, they are very reliable...



#36

matt234
MR2 Aficionado
  • Total Posts : 313
  • Scores: 3
  • Reward points: 3193
  • Joined: 4/7/2011
  • Location: Ipswich / Springfield Qld Australia
  • Status: offline
RE: V6 camry, worth getting? Thursday, September 30, 2010 8:30 AM (permalink)
0
Its pretty obvious that no one will agree in this issue. The same debate has been on every mr2 forum since they first did the v6 conversion.

My 2c

AW11 - 1mz = win. Cmon they're tiny and have a 3.0 v6, thats awesome.
SW20 - 2gr = win. Stock vs stock the 2gr puts out plenty more torque and power than even the latest revision 3sgte.

The biggest problem with this debate is that peoples preferences will always be different. Personally I like the feel of a v6 hence why im ditching my 3sgte for a 2gr. That and i want something a little different.
#37
surok
MR2 Scholar
  • Total Posts : 2252
  • Scores: -31
  • Reward points: 4416
  • Joined: 4/7/2011
  • Location: Albania
  • Status: offline
RE: V6 camry, worth getting? Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:01 AM (permalink)
0
1mz in a sw20 would be nice if it revved till 8000.. the low revving nature of the toyota v6s put me off.
#38
matt234
MR2 Aficionado
  • Total Posts : 313
  • Scores: 3
  • Reward points: 3193
  • Joined: 4/7/2011
  • Location: Ipswich / Springfield Qld Australia
  • Status: offline
RE: V6 camry, worth getting? Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:20 AM (permalink)
0
quote:
Originally posted by surok

1mz in a sw20 would be nice if it revved till 8000.. the low revving nature of the toyota v6s put me off.



Yeah even a boosted 1mz would be nice in a sw20 i think but both require a fair bit of mods. That is if you want them to be reliable.
#39
MRTurbo
SA Moderator
  • Total Posts : 2894
  • Scores: 81
  • Reward points: 4791
  • Joined: 4/7/2011
  • Location: Adelaide SA Australia
  • Status: offline
RE: V6 camry, worth getting? Sunday, January 10, 2010 0:07 PM (permalink)
0
quote:
Originally posted by surok

1mz in a sw20 would be nice if it revved till 8000.. the low revving nature of the toyota v6s put me off.


wtf? The 1MZ isn't low revving - it makes power all the way to the limiter and doesn't feel "out of breath".
#40
matt234
MR2 Aficionado
  • Total Posts : 313
  • Scores: 3
  • Reward points: 3193
  • Joined: 4/7/2011
  • Location: Ipswich / Springfield Qld Australia
  • Status: offline
RE: V6 camry, worth getting? Sunday, January 10, 2010 1:39 AM (permalink)
0
quote:
Originally posted by MRTurbo

quote:
Originally posted by surok

1mz in a sw20 would be nice if it revved till 8000.. the low revving nature of the toyota v6s put me off.


wtf? The 1MZ isn't low revving - it makes power all the way to the limiter and doesn't feel "out of breath".



I think by low revving he means the rev limit is set fairly low. I think its like 6500 or something.
#41
Vinnny
MR2 Aficionado
  • Total Posts : 413
  • Scores: 0
  • Reward points: 1090
  • Joined: 4/7/2011
  • Location: Sydney NSW Australia
  • Status: offline
RE: V6 camry, worth getting? Sunday, January 10, 2010 1:43 AM (permalink)
0
yeah my 1mz i reckon itll make power all the way up to 7500 but its got a limiter at 6750 which is annoying.

meh i like my engine the way it drives. the turbo definately pulls harder but i like my torqueyness :)
#42
MRTurbo
SA Moderator
  • Total Posts : 2894
  • Scores: 81
  • Reward points: 4791
  • Joined: 4/7/2011
  • Location: Adelaide SA Australia
  • Status: offline
RE: V6 camry, worth getting? Sunday, January 10, 2010 3:05 AM (permalink)
0
quote:
Originally posted by matt234

quote:
Originally posted by MRTurbo

quote:
Originally posted by surok

1mz in a sw20 would be nice if it revved till 8000.. the low revving nature of the toyota v6s put me off.


wtf? The 1MZ isn't low revving - it makes power all the way to the limiter and doesn't feel "out of breath".



I think by low revving he means the rev limit is set fairly low. I think its like 6500 or something.


It's set "low" because Toyota normally don't want their engines to end up as a pile of little bits of metal....
#43
Knightrous
MR2 Deity
  • Total Posts : 2045
  • Scores: 272
  • Reward points: 5721
  • Joined: 4/7/2011
  • Location: .
  • Status: offline
RE: V6 camry, worth getting? Sunday, January 10, 2010 4:58 AM (permalink)
0
quote:
Originally posted by MRTurbo

quote:
Originally posted by matt234
I think by low revving he means the rev limit is set fairly low. I think its like 6500 or something.


It's set "low" because Toyota normally don't want their engines to end up as a pile of little bits of metal....



IIRC, Tristan (WTFAuto) ran the the stock rods and pistons in the 1MZ to 8000RPM with out failure. (He did wreck the pistons @ 375RWHP and the stock rods to 500+ RWHP before they failed, both I would say are just the limits of the parts strength more then the RPM).
#44
Vinnny
MR2 Aficionado
  • Total Posts : 413
  • Scores: 0
  • Reward points: 1090
  • Joined: 4/7/2011
  • Location: Sydney NSW Australia
  • Status: offline
RE: V6 camry, worth getting? Sunday, January 10, 2010 7:05 AM (permalink)
0
wait i thoguth you said they were good up to 7500 not 8000!! im gonna put mine up to 8000 if i can then!!
#45
Page: < 1234 > Showing page 3 of 4 - Powered by APG vNext Trial
Jump to:
© 2025 APG vNext Trial Version 5.5