just_ace
Moderator
- Total Posts : 2508
- Scores: 89
- Reward points: 4598
- Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
- Location: perth wa Australia
- Status: offline
Re:E85 Fuel to Caltex
2011/05/22 14:31:32
(permalink)
yeh..um...what he said. E85WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! still dont have any over here......gggrrrrrrr!
|
MuMan
MR2 Scholar
- Total Posts : 701
- Scores: 20
- Reward points: 1681
- Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
- Location: Bris. Qld.
- Status: offline
Re:E85 Fuel to Caltex
2011/05/22 19:15:14
(permalink)
Cogs, you make some good points. One thing I'm not so sure about is the fact that we are burning Ethanol in solution with 98, and need to consider the ign properties accordingly, rather than in isolation. I would expect the unburned fuel in the form of HC emissions is vaporising in the exhaust manifold (~1100degF) after the combustion process. Obviously as the mix ratio increases (well beyond what we are talking about) the ign process becomes more critical, and incomplete combustion could become a factor, on the stock ign system at least. In relation to VE, I'm not referring to the engines ability to ingest more air, but the effect of the additional O2 in the combustion mix effectively generating a higher volume of exhaust gas, hence more power, better spool. Same intake volume..more exhaust volume if you will. Anyhow, not wanting to rant on, but I've now tried this blend on several JDM n/a cars to gauge the result without needing to consider the effect of boost. It's not been a comparative test as such, as I've limited the mix to 10% to keep AFR's in check. The results in all 3 cases have been similar, although in varing degrees, but no where near the level I found on the 3SGTE. In all 3 cases there was an improvement in general driveability, acceleration and responsiveness. In the case of a 6A12 & EJ20 more and quicker revability and with a RB25DE a much stronger feeling of low to mid range torque. In all cases there's been that perceived feeling of more power..maybe it's the boost in low/mid range torque causing that..need to be dyno'd to draw any conclusions. By comparison, the gains I saw on the gen3/gt28/71 were almost jaw dropping when boosting up to 20psi, even in relation to my 98 performance tune. Also on the gen2 at 14psi the car just wanted to keep boosting (not bad for a lowly ct26) and I was more worried about the HG than anything else. I'd love to drop in a set of gen3 540's with fuel mods and up the mix ratio. There really is big gains available here, for anyone wanting to stay with the stock ECU rather than go standalone, but there are limits of course, so a dyno tune on a gen2 with MHG & fuel mods is about the only way of determining where they lay. Of course anyone with a standalone, or fuel/ign controller..sky's the limit where blends are concerned. BTW, there was a very noticeable increase in power in all 3 cars during cold ambient temps, suggesting possibly AFR's were still very rich..just don't know how rich.
post edited by MuMan - 2011/05/22 19:28:47
"Have you ever noticed when things get set in motion, the heavy end wants to go first."
|
cogs
MR2 Deity
- Total Posts : 511
- Scores: 40
- Reward points: 5597
- Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
- Location: Vic Australia
- Status: offline
Re:E85 Fuel to Caltex
2011/05/22 21:45:43
(permalink)
I'm somewhat envious MuMan that you have access to a few suitable cars for subjective testing. Kudos for doing as much as you have and giving everyone the benefit of your research  It really does seem that low level E85 blends hold real benefits for the performance scene, but I'm still a little concerned about the long term effects on non-ethanol compatible fuel system components. Anecdotal evidence seems to suggest that even to run low level blends requires significant fuel system upgrades for long term reliability. It almost seems negligent on the part of the oil companies not to make this information more available, given that 10% ethanol blends are commonplace.
|
purple5ive
MR2 Deity
- Total Posts : 2337
- Scores: 45
- Reward points: 2132
- Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
- Location: melbourne vic Australia
- Status: offline
Re:E85 Fuel to Caltex
2011/05/23 10:27:00
(permalink)
well a failure for 100ron shell racing fuel for me (ther dont sell it there anymore) and also another failure on E85 (same story dont stock it or never heard of it)
|
MRTurbo
SA Moderator
- Total Posts : 2894
- Scores: 81
- Reward points: 4791
- Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
- Location: Adelaide SA Australia
- Status: offline
Re:E85 Fuel to Caltex
2011/05/23 11:38:35
(permalink)
purple5ive: As mentioned earlier, Shell V-Power Racing has been phased out since 2008. who did you ask? the console operator at your local servo? I bet you can get it in Melbourne and she's heard of it below. Email Maybelle Reyes - Biofuels Marketing Manager, Caltex Australia Petroleum Pty Ltd mreyes@caltex.com.au You will then know the answer.
post edited by MRTurbo - 2011/05/23 11:45:59
1990 SW20 GT 3S-GTE Targa 2001 Honda CBR600F4i
|
purple5ive
MR2 Deity
- Total Posts : 2337
- Scores: 45
- Reward points: 2132
- Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
- Location: melbourne vic Australia
- Status: offline
Re:E85 Fuel to Caltex
2011/05/23 12:09:41
(permalink)
Thanks man iil email and see what response i can get cheers
|
matt234
MR2 Aficionado
- Total Posts : 313
- Scores: 3
- Reward points: 3193
- Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
- Location: Ipswich / Springfield Qld Australia
- Status: offline
Re:E85 Fuel to Caltex
2011/05/23 13:37:34
(permalink)
Ok time for a silly question.. Will running the e85 at 80/20 in newer non-import engines have the same or any positives? Basically what im asking is will this be of any benefit in my 2gr since their ecu was tuned to run 95 octane?
|
MuMan
MR2 Scholar
- Total Posts : 701
- Scores: 20
- Reward points: 1681
- Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
- Location: Bris. Qld.
- Status: offline
Re:E85 Fuel to Caltex
2011/05/23 16:09:26
(permalink)
Short answer, no I wouldn't suggest it. All these other cars have been tuned for JDM fuel, and there's a lot to be gained by running 100 RON or better. If the 2gr is tuned for 95 RON and your running that or 98, there wouldn't be anything to be gained by getting to 100 RON, without a re-tune. There are other gains coming from the properties of the fuel itself, but in your case I'd think AFR's would be close to a safe margin already. You could give a 10% blend a try, being relatively safe (E10 compliant) and see what you get out of it.
post edited by MuMan - 2011/05/23 16:17:26
"Have you ever noticed when things get set in motion, the heavy end wants to go first."
|
MuMan
MR2 Scholar
- Total Posts : 701
- Scores: 20
- Reward points: 1681
- Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
- Location: Bris. Qld.
- Status: offline
Re:E85 Fuel to Caltex
2011/05/23 16:42:30
(permalink)
Anyone interested in the effects of ethanol blended fuels, take a look at the extract from MHR below, that lists 4 points, that seem to have become accepted as the 4 issues involving blended fuels. There's a lot to be said everywhere, but when you look at chemlab results and industry testing (such as Brazil's E20 & E25) you soon come to realise these 4 issues are factual. 1.Water - Ethanol has a great affinity with water. Most metal components in fuel systems will corrode or rust in the presence of water. Fuel blended with 10% Ethanol will increase the quantity of water it can absorb without separating out. It is important to note that the addition of Ethanol doesn't suddenly create water out of nowhere, but tends to "pickup" water more easily throughout the transportation and storage phase of its distribution to end users. It is generally accepted that 10% blends do not pose a significant risk of fuel system corrosion in everyday use, as Ethanol blends have increased quantities of anti-corrosion additives found in normal un-blended fuels. 2.Fuel System Contaminants - 10% Ethanol blends can cause problems with cars that already have a heavily contaminated fuel system to begin with. Ethanol can act like a solvent, scouring gum, varnish, dirt and water from the insides of fuel tanks and fuel lines, leading to clogging fuel filters more regularly until contaminants are cleaned from the system. 3.Material Incompatibility - Older cars can be at risk of accelerated wear of rubber, cork and certain plastic fuel system components, but these very same components are equally at risk when used with fuels containing high levels of toluene, the additive primarily responsible for improving the octane rating of unleaded fuel. 4.Fuel consumption - Ethanol has a lower energy content when compared to petrol, requiring a slightly higher volume of fuel to be burned in order to provide the same amount of power. In theory, an engine using a 10% blend should consume 3.8% more fuel. This is somewhat offset by a sligh improvement in efficiency, but is very much dependant on the type of engine. Now for the good news. As demonstrated by the fuel tests, significant performance gains can be made by using a 10% Ethanol blend. This is becuase Ethanol is an oxygen rich fuel, and this assists with improving the combustion process. Most importantly the addition of Ethanol improves resistance to detonation, which is good news in a turbocharged car such as the WRX and Evo. The ECU in the WRX will respond to improved fuel quality and will increase the maximum amount of ignition advance generating more power. As a general rule of thumb, 95 RON unleaded fuel blended with 10% Ethanol will achieve an octane rating of between 97.5 and 98.5 RON.
"Have you ever noticed when things get set in motion, the heavy end wants to go first."
|
matt234
MR2 Aficionado
- Total Posts : 313
- Scores: 3
- Reward points: 3193
- Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
- Location: Ipswich / Springfield Qld Australia
- Status: offline
Re:E85 Fuel to Caltex
2011/05/23 17:30:56
(permalink)
MuMan Short answer, no I wouldn't suggest it. All these other cars have been tuned for JDM fuel, and there's a lot to be gained by running 100 RON or better. If the 2gr is tuned for 95 RON and your running that or 98, there wouldn't be anything to be gained by getting to 100 RON, without a re-tune. There are other gains coming from the properties of the fuel itself, but in your case I'd think AFR's would be close to a safe margin already. You could give a 10% blend a try, being relatively safe (E10 compliant) and see what you get out of it. Thanks, pretty much what i gathered from what id read. Back to saving pennies for a new ECU.
|
purple5ive
MR2 Deity
- Total Posts : 2337
- Scores: 45
- Reward points: 2132
- Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
- Location: melbourne vic Australia
- Status: offline
Re:E85 Fuel to Caltex
2011/05/24 11:36:11
(permalink)
for the south east suburbs - mornington peninsula areas this place has it 841 Nepean Highway mornington caltex its the one near mornington autobarn MRTURBO - Mabelle put me onto it, it was on my list of places to go but now its confirmed. cheers mate
|
just_ace
Moderator
- Total Posts : 2508
- Scores: 89
- Reward points: 4598
- Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
- Location: perth wa Australia
- Status: offline
Re:E85 Fuel to Caltex
2011/05/24 20:05:39
(permalink)
with the whole thing about the ecu constantly advancing and retarding timing in response to knock, wouldn't running e85 in a car tuned for 95 still run more timing due to the higher knock rating? also how much e85 would be needed to add to 91oct to achieve the same oct rating as 80/20 98/e85? another thing, all the stuff about needing e85 compatible lines etc what about the fuel level sender? how would that be affected as that's something you can't change
|
MuMan
MR2 Scholar
- Total Posts : 701
- Scores: 20
- Reward points: 1681
- Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
- Location: Bris. Qld.
- Status: offline
Re:E85 Fuel to Caltex
2011/05/24 21:10:55
(permalink)
Not if it was running a fully useable ign advance curve on 95 (or 98). The ECU will only apply the ign advance levels programmed into the existing ign map. According to my calculations 80/20 is approx ~104 RON. So if the estimate on 95 above is accurate, then 91 would require approx 30% to make 100 RON. From what I know, some fuel senders have been reported as sending erronious fuel levels on E85, but this seems to be a particular type of sender, and may be from the increased conductivity of the fuel, as much as the fuel itself.
"Have you ever noticed when things get set in motion, the heavy end wants to go first."
|
purple5ive
MR2 Deity
- Total Posts : 2337
- Scores: 45
- Reward points: 2132
- Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
- Location: melbourne vic Australia
- Status: offline
Re:E85 Fuel to Caltex
2011/05/25 09:00:12
(permalink)
copy and paste from email i got from caltex Hi Steve
Sounds fine to me - there's no issue with blending the two products as long as the car has ethanol compatible components and the engine is tuned for it. If you've already got the advice that it works well then it's worth a shot in my opinion.
The blend will easily get you to 100 RON (our tests on E-Flex have consistently clocked up 105 RON). Sound fun! I'm happy to share what I know and hope that will get you asking the right questions to the guys who service your car. I've attached a PDF of the recommended modifications to a vehicle by ANFAVEA (who are the National Association of Vehicle Manufacturers in Brazil - who as you know are THE ethanol fuel trailblazers of the world) which might give you some insight on what needs to be done to run ethanol fuels. The english grammar is a bit messy because of the translation, but the gist is there.
Blending 98 with E-Flex is going to give you about 56-68% ethanol so you do need to take extra care with it's use. If the components have not been changed to be ethanol compatible, such as the pipes, seals, adhesives and even some metals like aluminium then you should definitely not leave the fuel sitting in the tank for extended periods.
Any increased erosion/corrosion will be gradual but the likelihood increases with the time ethanol is in contact with the seal, adhesive, rubber etc, so it may be good practice (after the ethanol fix) to drain the tank and flush the system and lines with 100% petroleum to make sure it's all washed off.
So that's what I know -- I also know there are hundreds of people using it with great success so it's just a matter of knowing what's going on in the engine, the fuel and managing it. There are just some realities with some vehicles and ethanol but I think there can still be a lot of fun to be had.
I hope that helps.
Kind regards if anyone wants to host the pdf file for me let me know and i will send it over im not too sure how she got the 56-68% ethanol bit i will try and clarify that soon
|
MRTurbo
SA Moderator
- Total Posts : 2894
- Scores: 81
- Reward points: 4791
- Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
- Location: Adelaide SA Australia
- Status: offline
Re:E85 Fuel to Caltex
2011/05/25 09:21:31
(permalink)
I'm pretty sure when he says that you'll end up 56-68% ethanol with blending it with 98 means that THEIR 98 ('Vortex') probably already contains a fair bit of ethanol already. So 'Vortex' is probably cheap swill 91 mixed with ethanol to bump up the octane. It sounds like its long term use would definitely be detrimental to the car, unless your willing to fork out lots changing most of the fuel system. IF you are going to use the 80/20 mix then you'd be wise to stick with other 98 fuels (eg. Ultimate) that don't contain any ethanol to bump up the octane. But of course its quite convenient to fill up with Caltex 98 while you're there getting the E-Flex!
post edited by MRTurbo - 2011/05/25 09:28:37
1990 SW20 GT 3S-GTE Targa 2001 Honda CBR600F4i
|