Very scholar answer with great use of words and theory which frankly sounds impressive.
But at the end of the day really i don't care for it much, because your first statement is correct but choose to ignore the latter part of the sentence.
"It is a known physical property of gases that an increase of pressure results in an increase of temperature in the absence of any other energy transfer " Great thing about dyno logging and with a great shop is the ability to compare data
I couldn't care less that a Turbo , a small one or a bigger one has more power than the Rotrex. I enjoy the lower temps in my IAT's and engine bay ,the predictability and response of my boost relative to my foot like a N/A. It suits me the way i use my car , the Beams engine and the aesthetic installation to my eyes
Now back to the post ignoring the fact that you wish to tell me again that the Turbo is better, more efficient , has the ability to have bigger boost etc than the Rotrex which again i don't care, you rely on theory for your argument that it all results in lower temps and the Rotrex will have higher temps.
Well , fantastic thank you for the physics class but in real life that's a load of baloney.
The Rotrex's low IAT's are a testament that's its devoid of any other transfer heat being on the cold side of the engine away from any hot exhaust temperatures and NOT connected to the hottest part in the engine bay the exhaust manifold.
As far as the intercooler effectiveness for low IAT's well i don't think much for PWR barrel. Its weak compared to other designs.
And if you wish to take the
" intercooler effectiveness " out of the equation we ran my car without the water pump running a whole day ( to set up up cooling failure, ECU control ) at ambient temps of 36 degrees , the highest IAT's that were logged were 56 degrees Celsius , ( remember i
DON'T have twin 12 inch fans on my engine lid ) now ild like to see a Turbo to be that low with no intercooler, IT WONT.
post edited by MANDALAY - 2012/05/06 04:57:59