Go back to home

Can I setup Front BBK with Standard Rears?

Author
Steve_A
MR2 Aficionado
  • Total Posts : 342
  • Scores: 15
  • Reward points: 5452
  • Joined: 2011/05/25 14:01:55
  • Status: offline
2016/09/17 19:21:14 (permalink)
0

Can I setup Front BBK with Standard Rears?

I have a set of Grex/Alcon brakes & rotors for the front which I decided to grab at a good price. The plan is to run them with the Wolfkatz rear BBk, however the money I had ready to order them is now going to be spent on an ECU and tune so they will have to wait.
 
I'm going to be very keen to push the car soon after the tune is finished and I have encounter fade issues with the stock 91 setup on the track. What I'm wondering is will it be possible to install the Grex brakes up front and adjust the brake bias and have a setup that will brake as well as the 91 setup but be more resistant to fade?
 
If not I'll just leave them stock setup alone but I'd rather have good reliable braking to go along with the increase in power. Any advice is appreciated as I've never worked on brakes beyond changing pads and bleeding the lines!
#1


14 Replies Related Threads

    Guest
    MR2 Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 36
    • Scores: 0
    • Reward points: 1547
    • Joined: 2011/04/07 00:00:00
    • Status: online
    Re: Can I setup Front BBK with Standard Rears? 2016/09/17 20:25:39 (permalink)
    0
    From what I heard ..... But would also like to hear what others that have the experience ...
    #2
    chausta
    MR2 Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 162
    • Scores: 5
    • Reward points: 5949
    • Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
    • Location: Perth WA Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: Can I setup Front BBK with Standard Rears? 2016/09/17 23:59:19 (permalink)
    0
    I currently have wilwoods front and standard rear calipers with a rx8 rotor. I always lock up the front on heavy braking. If you can control the brake bias, I can't see why it wouldn't work. How are you going to control the brake bias?
    #3

    Carmikey
    MR2 Deity
    • Total Posts : 1969
    • Scores: 260
    • Reward points: 6437
    • Joined: 2012/04/23 15:31:23
    • Location: Greenwith 5125, S.A. Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: 2016/09/18 08:05:28 (permalink)
    0
    Steve, u state u are getting fade on the track. What pads and fluid are u running?

    Sent from my SM-G800Y using Tapatalk

    #4
    MCT_MR2
    MR2 Deity
    • Total Posts : 626
    • Scores: 104
    • Reward points: 4232
    • Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
    • Location: Melbourne Victoria Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: 2016/09/18 09:06:51 (permalink)
    +1 (1)
    You could possibly setup the brakes to work with reasonable balance, but you will be far from getting the best performance from them.

    It would take an adjustable bias adjuster, and a low coefficient eduro compound pad in the front, and a high coefficient compound in the rear of the car. Along with high quality fluid and ducting on the rear brakes, you'd get away with it.

    But carmikey probably has the best thought process on this. What pads and brake fluid are you running? And what kind of fade? Boiling the fluid (pedal travel increases/ goes soft) or pad fade (pedal stays hard, but stopping distance increases)

    Switch to a high quality fluid, with a high boiling point. Also once you have boiled brake fluid, you really need to rebleed or flush the fluid. High performance pads are also needed to allow for repeatable braking performance.

    Also airflow to the brakes can improve perfomance as well. Whether it is a basic air guide bolted between the caliper mounting bolts or a proper ducted unit , keeping temps in check can go a long way to helping. I dont know if anyone actually makes them for mr2 calipers, but look for titanium anti rattle shims. They effectively act as a thermal barrier between the pad and the caliper piston, which can help prevent the brake fluid from boiling.

    '88 MR2 4AGTE W/ EFR6258

    224.6KW @ 20PSI

    more to come......
    #5
    kameleon
    Supporter
    • Total Posts : 2733
    • Scores: 106
    • Reward points: 6018
    • Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
    • Location: melbourne vic Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: 2016/09/18 21:10:22 (permalink)
    0
    I do not recommend anyone run a BBK on the front and not the RX8 or similar conversions as the difference in bias is far too great and you do not get the benefit of what you have fitted to the front in the first place.
     
    What MCT mentions about brake pad choice is the most cost effective way to bring the balance of your front and rear BBK's closer to what the car left the factory with. It will not be enough for a Grex front 4/6 piston kit and a factory rear however.
     
    #6

    Guest
    MR2 Enthusiast
    • Total Posts : 36
    • Scores: 0
    • Reward points: 1547
    • Joined: 2011/04/07 00:00:00
    • Status: online
    Re: 2016/09/19 19:15:40 (permalink)
    0
    http://www.mr2oc.com/59-general-mk2-faq-newbie-center/292856-brake-faq-rotor-caliper-mc-sizes.html

    A little info.... What I read into (love mr2 research), bias is factory set to release pressure on the rear when pressure exceeds the setting. A rear upgrade, such as a larger disc, does not change the piston or piston pressure managed by the bias. I can understand that not upgrading the rear (disc size to assist in heat dispersion or hot spots) would be a recipe for disaster if your pushing more "stress / demand" on the brakes.

    Be interesting if anyone has had access to actual braking monitoring equipment that gives g and other data. Challenge is it is so dependant on brake pads used.
    #7
    5SGTE
    MR2 Deity
    • Total Posts : 1909
    • Scores: 163
    • Reward points: 4724
    • Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
    • Location: qld Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: 2016/09/19 20:13:23 (permalink)
    0
    Pretty sure Eric had his on the brake dyno.
    #8
    kameleon
    Supporter
    • Total Posts : 2733
    • Scores: 106
    • Reward points: 6018
    • Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
    • Location: melbourne vic Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: 2016/09/20 00:05:52 (permalink)
    0
    TonyMR2
    http://www.mr2oc.com/59-g...-caliper-mc-sizes.html

    A little info.... What I read into (love mr2 research), bias is factory set to release pressure on the rear when pressure exceeds the setting. A rear upgrade, such as a larger disc, does not change the piston or piston pressure managed by the bias. I can understand that not upgrading the rear (disc size to assist in heat dispersion or hot spots) would be a recipe for disaster if your pushing more "stress / demand" on the brakes.

    Be interesting if anyone has had access to actual braking monitoring equipment that gives g and other data. Challenge is it is so dependant on brake pads used.

     
     
    And tyres and suspension and....
     
    So many variables. So back to back testing is where it is at.
     
    Bias although a function of pressure applied is greatly affected by any friction exerted no? therefore pad material and disc size do play a part in this also.
    #9
    MCT_MR2
    MR2 Deity
    • Total Posts : 626
    • Scores: 104
    • Reward points: 4232
    • Joined: 2011/04/07 19:51:15
    • Location: Melbourne Victoria Australia
    • Status: offline
    Re: 2016/09/20 07:47:15 (permalink)
    +1 (1)
    Rotor size has a massive part vs pressure TonyMR2. A perfect practical example of how rotor size (thefore leverage) will have an impact for the same pressure.

    Go somewhere in your house, and find a door. Have it partially open and stand in front of it. Without moving. Get your index finger and push the door open from a point in near the hinge. Hard wasn't it? Reset the door, and repeat from the middle of the door - a lot easier to do. Finally do it from the outer edge of the door - easier again.

    Without altering pressure applied, we increased the effect of the applied pressure, by moving further from the fulcrum point. Same thing happens when the same caliper is placed on a larger diameter rotor.

    In regards to your original question Steve A, what i meant to get at in my first post was, my opinion is you would be best of going for some quality pads and fluid, and hold off on the front upgrade until your have something to put on the rear with it.

    '88 MR2 4AGTE W/ EFR6258

    224.6KW @ 20PSI

    more to come......
    #10
    Steve_A
    MR2 Aficionado
    • Total Posts : 342
    • Scores: 15
    • Reward points: 5452
    • Joined: 2011/05/25 14:01:55
    • Status: offline
    Re: 2016/09/21 09:11:16 (permalink)
    0
    Thanks for all the input guys! When I went to the track the first time I boiled the brake fluid and changed it from whatever the previous owner was using to Motul RBF 600 as recommended by a friend who uses it in his Evo which sees regular track time.
     
    The car has Project Mu pads but I'm unsure which type as I didn't put them on the car, and I do still run into pad fade sometimes.
     
    I'd thought of controlling the bias with an adjustable proportioning valve and moving the knee point as well as reducing the rate that the pressure drops to the rears from that point. I hadn't thought of trying different coefficient pads front vs rear, that's an interesting idea!
     
    It does sounds like I'll be better of waiting till I have the rears sorted before installing the BBK's and just trying new pads for the time being.
     
    Any suggestions on pad choice? They'd have to be appropriate for daily driving as well as track use so I wouldn't be able to use pads that take a while to reach operating temp.
     
    I do remember Eric mentioning having his setup on a brake dyno, I'd never heard of one before, is it done on the car and can they be used to help you fine tune your setup?
    #11
    Eric
    QLD Moderator
    • Total Posts : 1117
    • Scores: 280
    • Reward points: 4319
    • Joined: 2012/04/06 21:41:57
    • Status: offline
    Re: 2016/09/21 13:15:45 (permalink)
    0
    5SGTE
    Pretty sure Eric had his on the brake dyno.



    Yes, I had mine on a brake dyno with the Delta V Kit front and rears. 

    I cant remember the numbers, but the car was maxing out the brake dyno when the rear wheels were on it. 

    The rears provided more force than the fronts in this situation, as the fronts would lock up due to the cars natural weight distribution. Talking to the brake shop, they explained that with mid engined cars, the rear brakes were very important in a good setup.

    I would not run just a front BBK.




    1990 SW20 Hardtop - Supercharged 2GR-FZE
    #12
    track_mr2
    MR2 Scholar
    • Total Posts : 411
    • Scores: 25
    • Reward points: 3342
    • Joined: 2012/09/17 15:42:32
    • Status: offline
    Re: 2016/09/21 19:31:59 (permalink)
    0
    I just fitted a set of Delta V big brakes front and rear (supra front rotor / rx8 rear rotors). I haven't had a chance to take the car to a track yet with these brakes or bed the brake pads in however I did take the car for a drive around the block a few times to makes sure the fluid was bled properly and everything was working right. I find it very easy to lock front brakes with this set up. The rotors and pads are both new so hopefully when bedding in and at proper speed the balance comes back to the factory setup but as it is now the fronts lock very easily. The car is a Gen 3 with the factory master cylinder.
    post edited by track_mr2 - 2016/09/22 18:04:01
    #13
    track_mr2
    MR2 Scholar
    • Total Posts : 411
    • Scores: 25
    • Reward points: 3342
    • Joined: 2012/09/17 15:42:32
    • Status: offline
    Re: 2016/09/21 19:46:51 (permalink)
    0
    TonyMR2
    http://www.mr2oc.com/59-g...-caliper-mc-sizes.html

    A little info.... What I read into (love mr2 research), bias is factory set to release pressure on the rear when pressure exceeds the setting. A rear upgrade, such as a larger disc, does not change the piston or piston pressure managed by the bias. I can understand that not upgrading the rear (disc size to assist in heat dispersion or hot spots) would be a recipe for disaster if your pushing more "stress / demand" on the brakes.

    Be interesting if anyone has had access to actual braking monitoring equipment that gives g and other data. Challenge is it is so dependant on brake pads used.



    The rotor size does make a big difference for braking force. This is because bigger rotors mean the calipers get pushed further out and the further out they are the more torque they produce. The same deal as using a big wrench vs a smaller wrench. You need less force to get the same leverage. So in the case of fitting BIG 4/6 pistons brakes up front odds are the rotor will be bigger, giving greater torque, the pad area is bigger giving greater friction, however your still pushing the same amount of fluid through the brake lines for the same amount of pedal travel as before as you still have the same master cylinder however the pots are larger (more pots/larger in total) most likely then what the factory calipers had so this negates the pedal effort a little. (Confusing I know, so basically if you fit a really big set of calipers and keep the same size master cylinder, you have to push the pedal further down before the brakes work because you need to push more fluid to fill the pots). So ultimately if you fit big brake kits using after market calipers you CAN SOMETIMES end up with worse then factory brakes or lots of experimenting to get the right pedal feel and balance.
    #14
    Eric
    QLD Moderator
    • Total Posts : 1117
    • Scores: 280
    • Reward points: 4319
    • Joined: 2012/04/06 21:41:57
    • Status: offline
    Re: 2016/09/22 09:50:24 (permalink)
    +4 (4)
    Lets not forget that there is no point doing a BBK if you aren't going to put sticky/wider tyres on. If you're already locking up average tyres with standard brakes, a big brake kit will not provide any improvement

    1990 SW20 Hardtop - Supercharged 2GR-FZE
    #15
    Jump to:
    © 2025 APG vNext Trial Version 5.5