alexv
Actually Dudeman, a question for you since you have driven both the turbo and non-turbo: do you feel the lack of turbo while driving the non-turbo MR2, or not really?
I have seen some sweet non-turbo MR2 around, but I feel like I may end up regretting not getting the turbo'd one.
But then again, I am currently driving a 96 Mustang Cobra and I can never really step on it as it gets up to the legal speed very quickly making me feel like I don't really need the extra power (but the exhaust sounds wonderful)...
The n/a is a very nice car and is cool to drive, i've had a lot of enjoyment out of it, but the basic answer is that they are totally different cars power wise.
From a standing start the turbo is good thumping acceleration fun, tight bends on uphills you can give the n/a just about 100% (not through the corner...) and it gets up there - the turbo needs more care.
I used the n/a as a commuter for nearly eight years, the turbo is now the preferred car for fun.
Reddtarga
Timing belt replacement.
Dudeman, what exactly did you get for $400?
To do the job properly many people also recommend changing other stuff at the same time, including:
Quality HSN belt
New tensioner
New genuine Toyota full water pump
New belt rollers
Cam seals etc.
That's perhaps a total of $400+ for parts alone.
Toyota timing belt, major service, none of the other parts you mentioned.
Done at 100,000 and 200,000.
Touch wood - 275,000 k's no dramas.
That's for the n/a. Haven't had timing belt done on the turbo, but Camden Toyota were happy to service it as well.