track_mr2 , I think you may have mis-interpreted my post. Terry is a busy man, not only does he have a workshop full of customer cars to work on but he also has to deal with customer "issues". In this case he took the time to give us more of the background to this story.
From what he has posted I'm seeing a car that had a previous idle problem, seemingly related to the air-con system. After fitting a used engine/transmission package (customers decision) plus "other work", the customer initially OK'd the result. A "few" days later (and I'm going to presuming that was a few days of driving) he then spent several hours trying to track a recurrence of the historical idle problem - at no extra charge to the customer. He couldn't find the fault (possibly because as is often the case the car behaved itself in the workshop) but used his experience to propose a possible cause and solution, e.g. the idle control valve. He has also (obviously) advised that in this case a new part from Toyota will be preferable to used - and he would probably have a few of these on the parts shelf.
Now both he and the customer are at the mercy of Toyota's supply line, and I know what that can be like. No joy, he advises the customer and the customer decides to cancel the order. Fair enough. What I don't think was fair was at no point prior to Terry's reply were we told about the historical idle problem or the parts delay.
Also, Terry's explanation about wanting the original ECU sounds perfectly reasonable. He wants to make sure that the replacement part he is sending is the right one. And I've not yet heard if the replacement was going to be free of charge under warrant or not.